评论
打印
One of the things that we also know after looking at this for two to three years, is that the mortality from COVID is very similar if not less than, than influenza.
在两三年的观察后，我们还发现，新冠疫情的死亡率与流感非常接近，或者低一点。
So when we look at this, we wonder, you know, why you seem to really embrace basic immunology back in 2004 and how you, or why you seem to reject it now?
所以得知了这一点后，我们想知道，为什么你在2004年好像确实承认了基础免疫学，现在又如何，或者说为什么要反对它？
Well, I don't reject basic immunology, Senator, and I have never denied that there is importance of the protection following infection.
我并不反对基础免疫学，参议员，我也从未否认感染后对患者实施保护的重要性。
However, as we have said many times and has, has been validated by the authorization of the, by the FDA, through their committee and the recommendation by the CDC, through their committee, that a vaccination following infection gives an added extra boost.
然而，正如我们多次说过的，感染后接种疫苗会产生额外的副作用，这一点已得到FDA委员会的授权，疾控中心委员会也这样建议。
I have never, ever denied fundamental immunology.
我从未否认过基础免疫学。
In fact, I wrote the chapter in the textbook of medicine...
事实上，这一章是我写在医学教科书上的……
Is it any of the...
它有任何的……
On fundamental immunology.
我在基础免疫学的教科书上写的。
Any of the guidelines for vaccines?
有任何关于疫苗的指南提过这件事吗？
You know. Do any of the guidelines for vaccines from the government include previous infection as something to base your decision-making on, with vaccines?
政府的疫苗指南中有没有涉及感染过的情况，作为你在疫苗问题上进行决策的依据？
Do any of the guidelines involve previous infection?
指南中有没有涉及感染过的情况？
That's why you're ignoring previous infection, 'cause it doesn't involve any of the guidelines.
这就是为什么你忽略了这种情况，因为没有任何指南提到过。
