n. 观察,观察力,评论
adj. 被设计用来
您现在的位置: 首页 > 英语听力 > 英语视频听力 > 纪录片 > 《恐龙灭绝真相》纪录片 > 正文
- The objection was based on one simple observation, earth has been hit many times...
- 这种异议基于一个简单的发现,地球已经遭受过多次碰撞,
- and these impacts, even the really big ones, seldom coincide with mass extinctions.
- 而这种碰撞,哪怕是最大的碰撞,都很少与物种大灭绝相关联。
- For the very large craters that we think might have produced global effects,
- 我们通常认为那些巨大的陨石坑会造成全球性的影响,
- in some cases they don't line up with any extinction events whatsoever
- 但是一方面它们没有关系到任何一次灭绝事件,
- and in other cases extinction events, very well dated extinction events
- 另一方面,就清楚记载的灭绝事件而言,
- have occurred that are not associated with any impacts.
- 它们的发生都与碰撞无关。
- Because of this, some scientists had long doubted that any impact could have wiped out the dinosaurs
- 基于这个原因,一些科学家一直都在怀疑究竟是不是大碰撞导致了恐龙消失,
- and now there is new evidence which seems to reinforce those suspicions.
- 现在他们的疑虑有了新的证据作为支撑。
- The new evidence relates to the forest fires that were said to have raged all over the world.
- 这些新的证据,与据说肆虐了整个世界的森林大火有关。
- They seem to have been supported by soot in the KT boundary layers,
- 支持该理论的证据是存在于第三纪界线层中的烟灰,
- but the problem with soot is that it can be blown thousands of miles from where the burning actually happened,
- 但是烟灰有可能是从实际发生火灾的数千英里之外被吹到这里来的,
- so one researcher decided to investigate a more reliable kind of evidence... charcoal!
- 所以一位研究人员决定着手调查一种更为可靠的证据:木炭!

扫描二维码进行跟读打分训练

- 阅读本文的人还阅读了: